Syrian Naaman and Skin Disease

While I was discussing the fact that there is a contradiction in the texts regarding the two witnesses some other passages came up.

First comment to add for those that talk about the two witnesses.

1. "Truly, I tell you, "he continued, "no prophet is accepted in is hometown. Luke 4:24

2. In any case, I must press on today and tomorrow and the next day - for surely no prophet can die outside of Jerusalem. Luke 13:33.

3. Last but not least, in the chapter about the two witnesses it mentions the rain and the rain is usually symbolic of righteousness. The two witnesses stop the rain and prophet Hosea told the people that the LORD would betroth the people to him in righteousness and faithfulness and that he would plant her himself in Jezreel. Hence, why King David spoke of the Harp of Faithfulness that would come at night time. Prophet Jeremiah also spoke of the covenant of the night e.g. the last days of the end times.

Now in a previous post about the Jordanians/Ammonrites,  we also mentioned the wife of King Solomon and there is another name that is very similar and it is the male alternative Naaman, the Syrian who was cleansed of the skin disease by Elijah. Basically, in the scripture Jesus was telling the Jewish priests that he healed more people than the prophet and the priests asked is this the son of Joseph?

The priests would have known that Moses had asked for the blessing of the promise to be given to a descendent of Joseph. However, as we know the scriptures tell the people that Joseph wasn't the genetic father of Jesus Christ. Although, he surely was the "Lute of Lovingkindness" predicted by King David in Psalm 92.

In Luke 4, when Jesus was healing the people; the scripture tells you that when they called him the Son of God, he rebuked them for doing so, and would not allow them to speak of it.

He knew full well that the teachings about being born again a Son of God had been buried in the mists of time. He did have a conversation with Nicodemus about it in private. Just like he had many conversations with people in private. So if the conversation with Nicodemus was private, as it clearly was. Who recorded what he said? Ponder upon it.

He said 'HESED'.

The word Naaman also means 'Pleasantness'. When people are being pleasant it is much easier to give them the healing that they require. Hence, why when I was living in a very pleasant place in Australia, the skin disease cleared up. Naaman was also a Syrian soldier and soldiers can co-create a conflict of interest for themselves if they are pure hearted. Part of them wishes to defend their nations from harm, the other part of them wishes to have no part in harming others.

As we know there is nothing pleasant about war that purposely causes harm to others. War that impacts on mind, body and soul. So was this Syrian soldier Naaman Jewish? Had he been circumcised, and as such had mutated genetics as well? Biblical history shows us the name Naaman stems from the tribe of Benjamin and they were definitely what could be considered to be Jewish.

Scientifically we know that cutting flesh in childhood mutates genetics, co-creating skin disease, allergies and clearly impacts on the governing meridian.

Hence why the 'Lute of Lovingkindness' stood against circumcision as mentioned in the Gospel of Thomas. Also Moses did not circumcise the children either during the 40 years in the wilderness. In the Gospel of Thomas, Jesus spoke of the circumcision of the Spirit as being the most beneficial.

His disciples said to him "Is circumcision beneficial or not? He said to them: If it were beneficial, their father would begat them circumcised from their mother. But the true circumcision, in spirit, gives the ultimate benefit'. GT 53. In other words the boys would have been born like it.

He also said "He who amongst you becomes as a child shall know the Kingdom, and he shall be higher than John". GT 46 Clearly, he knew that John Baptist was not a healer and had not healed himself by doing the inner child work necessary.

So was John the Baptist in the Spirit of Elijah? If he was, he would have been a healer and spiritual teacher. John the Baptist was more like an orthodox priest then a spiritual alchemist. Its like the difference between a clergyman and a self-development facilitator. Totally different fish. Clergymen give out sermons without interaction, and healing facilitators work in relationship with the healing process.

Happy are the "loners' and the chosen for you shall find the Kingdom. Because you are from the heart of it, and you shall go there again'. GT 49. When he speaks of the 'loner's he is talking about those that are willing to seek within on their spiritual path home. Some call it soul searching.

Onwards and upwards

ELIAKIM JOSEPH-SOPHIA

http://academysounds.blogspot.com/2011/11/ammonrites-usa.html